Thursday, June 20, 2013


Entry #1 6/20/13 while traveling from Colorado to New York on our annual summer visit to my parents beach house. I will try to focus on school...


So, this had been a book that was much mentioned as one that I should read.  I picked it because it had name recognition.  From the title, it seemed a bit pretentious. I knew I was supposed to know who Proust was, he is a French novelist, and I was bothered that I did not, so I did not care to read the book.  However, I am so glad I chose it.  The first sentence got me, “we were never born to read. Human beings invented reading only a few thousand years ago.” ( ). This was fascinating news to me as my seven year old asked me a similar question like how do we know how to speak or who invented reading....  I would have said that we were born reading, but of course, early cave men did not read...duh. I am usually strapped for words when my son asks a question that seemingly has no answer unless I had was better at retaining any past knowlege, but I am sure this was a question I had never pondered and certainly had never been explained to me.  My son is very good at stumping me.  I usually say “that is a Dad question” as he is a much better bullshitter than me and he lives by the motto “often wrong, but never in doubt”.  Need I say more...
So, Wolfe had me at the first sentence.  We were never born to read.

Wolfe aslo makes the points that we are what we read and to understand humans we should know what they read and when as this is so highly critical in shaping our brains as to be the nuts and bolts of who we are, depending on how our brain was programmed according to what we read and our language.  This seems like the basis for Gee’s theory of how we acquire our primary discourse and of Rosenblatt that we make meaning  and respond to the ink blots on the page depending on our experiences.  Wolfe cites a researcher David Swinney who asserts that depending on who we are and what our experiences have been “bug” can mean a wealth of different things.  This book is already so meaningful and encapsualtes all the theories of how we learn how to read.  Another example of this is the book that many toddlers hear by Dr. Seuss titled O’ the Places You’ll Go ,if read to a youngster who has not been outside of her neighborhood, will have a decidedly different meaning than to a younster who knows what travel entails.  The neurons we use early on, especially in acquiring language, then in learning to read are shaped and grow depending on the particular language and words we aquire.  

7 comments:

  1. ok, so I was laughing out loud with this post. i, like you, cannot for the life of me retain certain things so I am always sending my kids to ask their dad..he can think of something. I cant wait to read more. Sounds fascinating "..to understand humans we should know what they read and when as this is so highly critical in shaping our brains as to be the nuts and bolts of who we are." This leads me wondering what are we doing pushing so much on our littlest youngsters.. too much too soon? are we hurting our kids and squashing the joy of education because of wanting too much at the wrong time? Enjoy your drive out east! Happy blogging!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoyed your post. I never gave much thought to the statement quoted, but it's true, we are not born readers. As this is a learned skill, it is no wonder that there still exists communication barriers in today's society. In addition, because reading is something learned, we may not all learn this in the same way. Some of us are slow, some are fast, some jumble the letters on the page, and it all attests to the fact that this is a learned skill.

    I also have to mention that when you said you send your kids to their father for answers, I couldn't help but think of the dad from Calvin and Hobbes. He always has the best explanations for how things work. My personal favorite is defining the role of black and white photos.
    http://www.reoiv.com/random.asp?img=dadbandwandcolour.jpg&page=2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. very funny calvin and hobbs. gave me a headache trying to keep up with dad's explanation :)

      Delete
  3. I truly enjoyed this post! I really agree with the quote you spoke about; I can certainly say it has been a skill I have gained over the years, especially once I found my true interest in books. I think that the gain of the ability to read, is just the same as the gain of the ability to speak another language; practice makes perfect, the more you practice a language, the better you will get at it, therefore the same applies to reading. I honestly never knew how much I truly enjoyed to read, it wasn't until I was introduced to certain titles and topics that I began to pleasure read, allowing me to gain the skill to read fast, comprehend, and therefore apply the skill to my school work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gretchen,

    I am reading the same book! I am truly fascinated at the perplexities in this book. So many things I had assumed about the brain, but never realized. I look forward to synthesizing this text with you!


    Heather

    ReplyDelete
  5. Gretchen,

    Im glad you used Rosenblatt's example of experience as we read and what we take from it. That was what I was thinking when I was reading the beginning sentence of the last paragraph in your post. Great association. I'm glad this book is so meaningful to you, it will make for great posts. I look forward to reading more even though I wasn't born for it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like your story about your son! I think a kid could ask a question that would stump the most intelligent person in the world sometimes. So we were never born to read? Now it makes perfect sense why I was never a good reader. I am an excellent listener. I'm assuming we were born to listen. I do believe however, that some people are just innately better readers than others. Taking Gee's theory into consideration, I find myself wondering how much of our reading ability is nature versus nurture.

    ReplyDelete